Celeris-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)
Celeris-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | Not reported | 18.5 | — not comparable |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $310.24 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.86s | 4.00s | +365.1% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 365.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill