Celeris-1 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)
Celeris-1 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 13.1 | +107.9% Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-… is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 5.98s | +587.4% Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-… is 587.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.12 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemma-4-26b-a4b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill