Celeris-1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 37.6 points higher (43.9 vs 6.3) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 43.9 | +596.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 7.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $238.53 | +297.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 4.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.89s | 11.16s | +1153.9% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 1153.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Celeris-1: 596.8% more intelligence, 297.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1153.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Celeris-1GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-1-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-1-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill