Celeris-1 vs GPT-6 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or GPT-6 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (High) scores 36.1 points higher (42.4 vs 6.3) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($605 vs $60.0; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | GPT-6 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 42.4 | +573.0% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 6.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $604.52 | +907.7% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 14.58s | +1575.9% GPT-6 Sol (High) is 1575.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (High) vs Celeris-1: 573.0% more intelligence, 907.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1575.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- GPT-6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Celeris-1GPT-6 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill