Celeris-1 vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 32.6 points higher (38.9 vs 6.3) but costs 20× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $60.0; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 38.9 | +517.5% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 6.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $1,184.90 | +1875.2% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 20× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 17.34s | +1893.1% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 1893.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Celeris-1: 517.5% more intelligence, 1875.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1893.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Celeris-1Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill