Celeris-1 vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
Celeris-1 vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 6.9 | +9.5% Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B is 9.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | — | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen2.5-32b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen2.5-32b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill