Celeris-1 vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

Celeris-1 vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

CelerisCeleris-1Off the frontier
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
$60.0
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricCeleris-1Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.37.2+14.3% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 14.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$59.99Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)0.87s108.39s+12358.6% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 12358.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.20 / $0.70$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerCeleris-1: what beats itQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill