Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct '24) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct '24) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct '24) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.9 | 45.1 | +470.9% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1… is 5.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $444.60 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 16.22s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-35-sonnet/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-35-sonnet/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill