Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)

Claude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.80
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning)GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.811.2−50.9% GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is 50.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported32.68s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$15.0 / $75.0$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4.1 Opus (Reasoning): what beats itGLM-4.6V (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-1-opus-thinking/glm-4-6v-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-1-opus-thinking/glm-4-6v-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill