Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct

Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
18.60
Total cost
-
GoogleGemma 3n E4B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
4.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)Gemma 3n E4B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)18.64.8−74.2% Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is 74.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$15.0 / $75.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): what beats itGemma 3n E4B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-1-opus/gemma-3n-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-1-opus/gemma-3n-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill