Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) scores 10.1 points higher (27.0 vs 16.9) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1528 vs $594; both premium class). Pick Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 27.0 | +59.8% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 59.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $1,528.20 | +157.2% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.70s | 54.37s | +129.4% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 129.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 59.8% more intelligence, 157.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 129.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/kimi-k2-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/kimi-k2-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill