Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Kimi K3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 26.7 points higher (43.6 vs 16.9) but costs 6.2× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $594; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 16.9, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when 16.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Kimi K3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 43.6 | +158.0% Kimi K3 (Max) is 2.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $3,658.07 | +515.8% Kimi K3 (Max) is 6.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.38s | 53.89s | +121.0% Kimi K3 (Max) is 121.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Max) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 158.0% more intelligence, 515.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 121.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Kimi K3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/kimi-k3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/kimi-k3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill