Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) scores 7.6 points higher (16.9 vs 9.3) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($594 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 9.3 | −45.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 45.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $43.98 | −92.6% Llama 4 Maverick is 92.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.38s | 10.37s | −57.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 57.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 45.0% less intelligence, 92.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill