Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) scores 12.1 points higher (16.9 vs 4.8) but costs 49× as much to run the benchmark ($594 vs $12.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 4.8 | −71.6% Ministral 3 3B is 71.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $12.23 | −97.9% Ministral 3 3B is 97.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.36s | 3.07s | −87.4% Ministral 3 3B is 87.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 71.6% less intelligence, 97.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill