Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 31.2 points higher (48.1 vs 16.9) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $594; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 16.9, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when 16.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 48.1 | +184.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $2,000.35 | +236.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 3.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.18s | 84.79s | +265.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 265.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 184.6% more intelligence, 236.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 265.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill