Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 35.5 points higher (52.4 vs 16.9) but costs 9.7× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $594; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 16.9, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when 16.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 52.4 | +210.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $5,786.78 | +874.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 9.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.70s | 43.73s | +84.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 84.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 210.1% more intelligence, 874.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill