Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) scores 1.5 points higher (18.4 vs 16.9) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($941 vs $594; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 18.4 | +8.9% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 8.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $940.97 | +58.4% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 58.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.36s | 65.15s | +167.4% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 167.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 8.9% more intelligence, 58.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 167.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-5-397b-a17b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-5-397b-a17b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill