Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) scores 1.3 points higher (18.2 vs 16.9) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($896 vs $547; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 18.2 | +7.7% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 7.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $546.96 | $896.39 | +63.9% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 63.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.65s | 46.08s | +94.8% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 94.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.38 / $2.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 7.7% more intelligence, 63.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 94.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-6-35b-a3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-6-35b-a3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill