Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) scores 16.8 points higher (33.7 vs 16.9) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1336 vs $594; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 33.7 | +99.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 99.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $1,336.09 | +124.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.70s | 60.72s | +156.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 156.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 99.4% more intelligence, 124.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 156.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill