Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) scores 7.7 points higher (16.9 vs 9.2) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($594 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 9.2 | −45.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 45.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $405.10 | −31.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 31.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.66s | 6.22s | −73.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 45.6% less intelligence, 31.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill