Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) scores 8.5 points higher (29.6 vs 21.1) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($564 vs $247; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.6 | 21.1 | −28.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 28.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $563.51 | $247.26 | −56.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 56.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.03s | 6.61s | −76.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 76.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 28.7% less intelligence, 56.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) scores 50.60 for $548.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill