Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) scores 8.6 points higher (29.9 vs 21.3) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($471 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 21.3 | −28.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 28.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $471.22 | $250.18 | −46.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 46.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 22.57s | 4.63s | −79.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 79.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 28.8% less intelligence, 46.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) scores 53.40 for $278.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill