Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) scores 7.5 points higher (17.6 vs 10.1) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($524 vs $476; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.6 | 10.1 | −42.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 42.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $524.25 | $476.03 | −9.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 9.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.93s | 5.52s | −80.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 80.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 42.6% less intelligence, 9.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill