Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) scores 6.7 points higher (17.6 vs 10.9) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($524 vs $518; both premium class). Pick Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.6 | 10.9 | −38.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 38.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $524.25 | $518.07 | −1.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 1.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.93s | 8.78s | −69.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 69.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 38.1% less intelligence, 1.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill