Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.0 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
15.40
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.0 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)Ling 3.0 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)15.420.1+30.5% Ling 3.0 Flash is 30.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.45s12.48s+93.5% Ling 3.0 Flash is 93.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.00 / $5.00$0.07 / $0.22
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning): what beats itLing 3.0 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku/ling-3-0-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku/ling-3-0-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill