Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 25.6 points higher (46.3 vs 20.7) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $1501; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.7 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 46.3 | +123.7% Grok 4.7 (High) is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,501.22 | $3,880.88 | +158.5% Grok 4.7 (High) is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.53s | 30.44s | +41.4% Grok 4.7 (High) is 41.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning): 123.7% more intelligence, 158.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill