Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) scores 11.8 points higher (20.7 vs 8.9) but costs 24× as much to run the benchmark ($1501 vs $63.7; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 8.9 | −57.0% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 57.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,501.22 | $63.74 | −95.8% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 95.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.19s | 10.12s | −56.4% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 56.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning): 57.0% less intelligence, 95.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.4% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill