Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Think. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
20.70
Total cost
$1501
Allen Institute for AIOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)Olmo 3.1 32B ThinkDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.77.1−65.7% Olmo 3.1 32B Think is 65.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,501.22Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)21.58sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning): what beats itOlmo 3.1 32B Think: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/olmo-3-1-32b-think · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/olmo-3-1-32b-think?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill