Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.3 | 41.1 | +113.0% Ling 3.1 Flash is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,014.56 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.51s | 13.57s | +8.5% Ling 3.1 Flash is 8.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill