Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0

Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.30
Total cost
-
ReflectionBeam 1.0Off the frontier
Intelligence
30.30
Total cost
$319
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning)Beam 1.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)19.330.3+57.0% Beam 1.0 is 57.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$318.73— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.99s7.79s−35.0% Beam 1.0 is 35.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.40 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4.5 Sonnet (Non-reasoning): what beats itBeam 1.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill