Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 30B

Claude 4 Opus (Reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 30B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude 4 Opus (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.60
Total cost
-
IBMGranite 4.2 30BOff the frontier
Intelligence
12.70
Total cost
$111
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude 4 Opus (Reasoning)Granite 4.2 30BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.612.7−38.3% Granite 4.2 30B is 38.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$110.83— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported36.08s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$15.0 / $75.0$0.16 / $0.65
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude 4 Opus (Reasoning): what beats itGranite 4.2 30B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus-thinking/granite-4-2-30b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-opus-thinking/granite-4-2-30b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill