Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallbac… scores 0.2 points higher (51.2 vs 51.0) but costs 7.9× as much to run the benchmark ($5242 vs $662; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 51.0, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when 51.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 51.0 | −0.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 0.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,241.59 | $662.28 | −87.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 87.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.41s | 170.50s | +500.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 500.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback): 0.4% less intelligence, 87.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 500.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback)GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-high/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-high/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill