Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) vs Phi-4
Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) vs Phi-4. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) | Phi-4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 5.9 | −88.5% Phi-4 is 88.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,241.59 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 34.32s | 15.51s | −54.8% Phi-4 is 54.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.13 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-high/phi-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-high/phi-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill