Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct

Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
51.20
Total cost
$5242
AlibabaQwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)51.212.0−76.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 76.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$5,241.59Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)25.39s11.76s−53.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 53.7% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.21 / $0.84
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback): what beats itQwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-high/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-high/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill