Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
46.80
Total cost
$3158
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)46.820.8−55.6% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 … is 55.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$3,157.66Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.89s6.27s−42.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 … is 42.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.43 / $0.87
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback): what beats itDeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/deepseek-v4-pro-0424-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/deepseek-v4-pro-0424-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill