Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GLM-5 (Reasoning)
Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GLM-5 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) | GLM-5 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 27.9 | −40.4% GLM-5 (Reasoning) is 40.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,157.66 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.76s | 52.51s | +388.0% GLM-5 (Reasoning) is 388.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.00 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/glm-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/glm-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill