Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh)
Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) | GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 28.5 | −39.1% GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) is 39.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,157.66 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.76s | 135.03s | +1154.9% GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) is 1154.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.75 / $14.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/gpt-5-2-codex · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/gpt-5-2-codex?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill