Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5 mini (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) scores 30.0 points higher (46.8 vs 16.8) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($3158 vs $189; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 16.8, and GPT-5 mini (High) when 16.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) | GPT-5 mini (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 16.8 | −64.1% GPT-5 mini (High) is 64.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,157.66 | $188.66 | −94.0% GPT-5 mini (High) is 94.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.79s | 64.18s | +494.8% GPT-5 mini (High) is 494.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.25 / $2.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5 mini (High) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback): 64.1% less intelligence, 94.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 494.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)GPT-5 mini (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/gpt-5-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/gpt-5-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill