Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) scores 28.3 points higher (46.8 vs 18.5) but costs 165× as much to run the benchmark ($3158 vs $19.2; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.8 | 18.5 | −60.5% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 60.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,157.66 | $19.16 | −99.4% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 99.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.89s | 5.07s | −53.4% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 53.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback): 60.5% less intelligence, 99.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.4% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill