Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct

Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
46.80
Total cost
$3158
MicrosoftPhi-4 Mini InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)Phi-4 Mini InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)46.86.3−86.5% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 86.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$3,157.66Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.34s11.95s+15.6% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 15.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.07 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback): what beats itPhi-4 Mini Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/phi-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/phi-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill