Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
46.80
Total cost
$3158
AlibabaQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)46.89.6−79.5% Qwen3 Next 80B A3B In… is 79.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$3,157.66Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.25s4.56s−59.5% Qwen3 Next 80B A3B In… is 59.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.10 / $1.10
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback): what beats itQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill