Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)Off the frontier
Intelligence
46.80
Total cost
$3158
AlibabaQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)46.89.9−78.8% Qwen3 VL 235B A22B In… is 78.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$3,157.66Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.89s11.56s+6.2% Qwen3 VL 235B A22B In… is 6.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$10.0 / $50.0$0.21 / $1.39
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback): what beats itQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-low/qwen3-vl-235b-a22b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill