Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Claude Opus 5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Claude Opus 5 (High) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback)
Claude Opus 5 (High) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback): 1.6% less intelligence, 8.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Claude Opus 5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.9 | 48.1 | −1.6% Claude Opus 5 (High) is 1.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | $4,331.68 | +8.7% Claude Opus 5 (High) is 8.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.16s | 20.99s | +59.5% Claude Opus 5 (High) is 59.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $5.00 / $25.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Claude Opus 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback)Claude Opus 5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/claude-opus-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/claude-opus-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill