Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) scores 0.8 points higher (49.7 vs 48.9) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($5868 vs $3983; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb….
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.9 | 49.7 | +1.6% Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is 1.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | $5,867.76 | +47.3% Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is 47.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.10s | 40.42s | +123.3% Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is 123.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $5.00 / $25.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback): 1.6% more intelligence, 47.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 123.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback)Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/claude-opus-5-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/claude-opus-5-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill