Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 28.5 points higher (48.9 vs 20.4) but costs 8.8× as much to run the benchmark ($3983 vs $451; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 20.4, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when 20.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.9 | 20.4 | −58.3% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 58.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | $450.76 | −88.7% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 88.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.10s | 6.55s | −63.8% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 63.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback): 58.3% less intelligence, 88.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.8% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill