Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.9 | 7.5 | −84.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reas… is 84.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.18s | 11.40s | −29.5% Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reas… is 29.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill