Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5 nano (High)
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs GPT-5 nano (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) | GPT-5 nano (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.9 | 13.0 | −73.4% GPT-5 nano (High) is 73.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.16s | 87.53s | +565.1% GPT-5 nano (High) is 565.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.05 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/gpt-5-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/gpt-5-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill