Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 23.1 points higher (48.9 vs 25.8) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3983 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 25.8, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 25.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.9 | 25.8 | −47.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 47.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | $992.88 | −75.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 75.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.16s | 46.75s | +255.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 255.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback): 47.2% less intelligence, 75.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 255.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill