Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, M… scores 22.8 points higher (49.1 vs 26.3) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3983 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, M… when you need intelligence above 26.3, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 26.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.1 | 26.3 | −46.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 46.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | $992.88 | −75.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 75.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.03s | 41.22s | +142.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 142.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback): 46.4% less intelligence, 75.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 142.0% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) scores 52.50 for $3803.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill