Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 39.6 points higher (48.9 vs 9.3) but costs 91× as much to run the benchmark ($3983 vs $44.0; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.9 | 9.3 | −81.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 81.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | $43.98 | −98.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 98.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.16s | 11.18s | −15.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 15.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback): 81.0% less intelligence, 98.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 15.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill